Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.454Keywords:
Argumentasi Ilmiah, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Pembelajaran SainsAbstract
Berpikir kritis merupakan interpretasi dan evaluasi yang terampil dan aktif terhadap hasil observasi dan komunikasi, informasi dan argumentasi. Sementara argumentasi merupakan aktivitas verbal, sosial dan rasional yang bertujuan untuk meyakinkan kritik yang masuk akal tentang suatu pandangan yang dapat diterima. Tujuan yang paling penting dalam pendidikan sains adalah untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir siswa dalam konteks khusus sains. Artikel ini membahas mengenai konsep pembelajaran sains berbasis argumentasi ilmiah dan hubungannya dengan inkuiri, kontribusi argumentasi pada keterampilan berpikir kritis dan karakteristik proses berpikir kritis melalui argumentasi. Ciri utama dalam berpikir kritis, yaitu memutuskan tentang suatu keyakinan, merupakan sebuah argumen, dengan cara menilai argumen orang lain dan mengembangkan argumennya sendiri. Argumentasi memiliki kontribusi yang signifikan dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan karakteristik yang khas, yaitu menilai sumber informasi, mengevaluasi argumen dan menghasilkan argumen serta mempresentasikannya. Hasil kajian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pijakan teoritis bagi peneliti dan praktisi pendidikan sains dalam mengimplementasikan dan mengases argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis, baik secara terpisah, maupun kombinasi keduanya.
Downloads
References
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M. & Dorph, R. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 37(10) 1590-1612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958.
Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts. Review of Educational Research. 80(3), 336-371.
Choi, A., Hand, B. & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students’ Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Investigation. Research Science Education. 43, 1763-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9330-1
Coney, C. L. (2015). Critical Thinking in Its Contexts and in Itself. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 47(5) 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.883963
Constantinou C.P., Tsivitanidou O.E., Rybska E. (2018) What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning?. In: Tsivitanidou O., Gray P., Rybska E., Louca L., Constantinou C. (eds) Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0_1
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne J. 2000. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. London; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3%3C287::AID-SCE1%3E3.0.CO;2-A
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice. Vol. 32 No. 3. Summer 1993.
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception in Davies, M. et al (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education.
Ennis, R. H. (2016). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: a Vision. Topoi 10 Juni 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Park, J.Y. (2015). Research Trends on Argumentation in Science Education: a Journal ContentnAnalysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education. 2(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Executive Summary of The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press, California.
Facione, P. & Gittens, C.A. (2015). Think Critically. Pearson.
Fisher, A. (2007). Critical Thinking. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Govier, T. (1989). Critical Thinking as Argument Analysis?. Argumentation 3. 115-126. Kluweracademic Publishers. Printed In The Netherlands
Gray, R., & Kang, N.H. (2014). The Structure of Scientific Arguments by Secondary Science Teachers: Comparison of Experimental and Historical Science Topics. International Journal of Science Education. 36(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
Griffin, P. & Care, E. (2013). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Springer.
Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264-1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21451
Jackson, P. T. (2016). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics 2nd Ed. New York, Routledge.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview in Erduran S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (eds.) Argumentation in Science Education Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Pp. 3-27. Netherlands: Springer.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking in Fraser, B.J. (ed.) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education 24.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 67 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah dasar/ Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jakarta: Kemdikbud
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking Together and Alone. Educational Researcher 44(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X15569530
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2017). Argue with Me. Ney York, Routledge.
Lin, S. S. (2013). Science and Non-Science Undergraduate Students’ Critical Thinking and Argumentation Performance in Reading A Science News Report. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education. 12(5) 1023-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9524-2
Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra G. M., & Owens M. C. (2012). The Two Faces of Scientific Argumentation: Application to Global Climate Change in M.S. Khine (Ed.) Perspective on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research. (pp. 17-37). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_2
Oliveras, B., Márquez C., & Sanmartí N. (2013). The Use of Newspaper Articles as a Tool to Develop Critical Thinking in Science Classes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 885-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586736
Osborne J. (2010). Arguing To Learn In Science: The Role Of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science 328, 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu J., & Erduran S. (2013). The Nature of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-Oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education. 35(15), 2559-2586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
Sadler, T. D. & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education. 90(6), 986-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20165
Sampson, V. & Walker, J. P. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443-1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
Schwarz, B.B. & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Shaughnessy, M. E. (2004). An Interview With Deanna Kuhn. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034197.75510.ef
Siegel, H. (1992). On defining “critical thinker” and justifying critical thinking. In H. A. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of education, 1992. Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society (pp. 72–75). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
van Eemeren F.H., Jackson S., Jacobs S. (2015) Argumentation. In: Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation Library, vol 27. Springer, ChamVon der Muhlen, S., Richter, T., Schmid, S., Schmidt, E. M. & Berthold, K. (2016). Judging the Plausability of Arguments in Scientific Texts: a Students-Scientist Comparison.
Widodo, A., Waldrip, B. & Herawati, D. (2016). Students Argumentation in Science Lessons: A Story of Two Research Projects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 5(2), 199-208.
Yaman, F. (2018). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Development and Use of Multiple Levels of Representation and Written Arguments in General Chemistry Laboratory Courses. Research in Science Education
Yang, F.-Y., Liu, S.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., Wu, H.-K., Wu, Y.-T., … Tsai, C.-C. (2017). High-School Students’ Epistemic Knowledge of Science and Its Relation to Learner Factors in Science Learning. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9570-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract Views: 7914
| 
File Views: 5070
